Wednesday, 28 October 2026 · Taipei
TaiwanDefenceNews · Analysis · Intelligence
Latest

South Korea's defence minister says the Joint Chiefs must move to Sejong with his ministry

Kang Shin-chul told lawmakers the JCS would not be left in Seoul when the defence ministry relocates to Sejong by 2031, easing fears of a split command.

T
TaiwanDefence

Taipei ·

3 min read
Aerial view of the long white government complex buildings in Sejong with apartment towers and hills behind
File photo: The northern part of the Government Complex Sejong, where several South Korean ministries are based, in March 2015.Photo: Minseong Kim, via Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0 Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0)

TAIPEI —

South Korea's defence minister, Kang Shin-chul, has told lawmakers that the Joint Chiefs of Staff will have to move to the administrative city of Sejong together with the Ministry of National Defense, rather than staying behind in Seoul when the ministry relocates. He made the remarks on Monday, 26 October, during the closing comprehensive session of the National Assembly defence committee's annual audit of the ministry and the military.

The issue arose after the government's second plan to move central government bodies to Sejong, published on 13 October, added the foreign, unification and defence ministries to the list of agencies due to relocate by 2031. Yonhap news agency reported that the Joint Chiefs, which hold military command and operational authority, were not included in that plan, leaving open the possibility that the ministry would move while the military's operational headquarters remained in the capital.

Concerns over a divided command

Critics warned that such a split could weaken the response in a crisis and make it harder for the National Security Council, which brings together the presidential national security office and the foreign and security ministers, to work efficiently. Yoo Young-ha, a lawmaker from the opposition People Power Party, said that separating the two would put the minister and the chairman of the Joint Chiefs roughly 100 to 120 kilometres apart, forcing them to run operations by video conference in an emergency, according to Daejeon MBC.

Kang responded that the ministry had never said the two bodies would move separately. He said they had to move together and that a command post would naturally be needed, and he described the relocation as more than a transfer of buildings and staff, saying that the state itself was moving. He also argued that the defence ministry belongs wherever the president, as commander-in-chief, is based.

Gyeryongdae option raised

Hwang Myung-sun, a lawmaker from the ruling Democratic Party, suggested that the ministry could instead go to Gyeryongdae, the compound that houses the headquarters of the army, navy and air force, arguing that this would tie defence policy more closely to its execution. Kang said he partly agreed and noted that in the United States the defence department, the joint chiefs and the service headquarters all sit in the Pentagon, but he repeated that the decisive factor was proximity to the president.

A defence ministry official told Yonhap that the ministry would work closely with other agencies during the relocation talks so that support for the president's command of the armed forces and the military's readiness posture would not be disrupted. Yonhap reported that, given the particular nature of a defence ministry, it plans to work out the move with the agencies concerned on the principle that its support for the commander-in-chief must not be disrupted.

Legislation next

The relocation still needs changes to the law. Daejeon MBC reported that the National Assembly's land and transport committee was due to begin reviewing this week a special act on an administrative capital together with an amendment to the law on the multifunctional administrative city, which had excluded foreign affairs and security ministries from the move to Sejong. The broadcaster said that if the law and the relocation plan are changed, discussion would turn to the future of the Joint Chiefs and to the embassies that would follow the foreign ministry.

Sources

Have information about this story? Read how to contact the newsroom →

Discussion (0)

Comments are not currently available.

  • No approved comments yet.

More in Indo-Pacific